Quantum Computing
Readiness reviews and prototypes on simulators
Services / Emerging Technologies
Quantum computing, post-quantum cryptography and blockchain each solve a narrow set of problems well and many others poorly. We help you find out which group your problem is in, prove it on a small scale, and connect anything worth keeping to the systems you already run.
What this covers
This practice covers three areas that are often discussed together and rarely understood together. Quantum computing is a different kind of hardware that may one day solve certain simulation and optimization problems faster than classical computers. Today it is useful for research, prototyping and learning, not for running your business.
Post-quantum cryptography is the opposite case. It runs on ordinary computers, the first standards are published, and the work of moving to it can start now, because data encrypted today could be decrypted by a quantum computer later.
Blockchain is a shared, tamper-evident ledger that several organizations can write to without trusting any one of them to keep the master copy. It fits a specific kind of multi-party problem, and it is often not the simplest answer.
Each has a page of its own. They sit together here because they need the same discipline: a clear question, a small test, and an honest comparison with the conventional way of doing the same thing.
How we work
Every engagement in this practice starts with the problem, not the technology. We write down what a good answer looks like, how the problem is solved today, and what that costs. Then we build the conventional solution, or measure the existing one, so there is a baseline to beat.
Only then do we try the emerging approach: a quantum algorithm on a simulator, a ledger shared between two test participants, or a post-quantum algorithm in a copy of your environment. If it beats the baseline on something that matters to you, we say so and plan the next step. If it does not, we say that too, and you keep the baseline, which is often useful on its own.
We keep pilots small and time-boxed, document what we tried and why, and leave you with code and notes your own team can read and extend.
Where it connects
Emerging technology rarely stands alone. A post-quantum migration is mostly security and identity work across servers, applications and vendor products, which is what our managed IT and Microsoft security teams do every day. A quantum optimization prototype needs clean data and a pipeline to feed it, which is our data and analytics work. A blockchain pilot needs APIs into the systems that hold your orders, records and documents, which is systems integration.
So the people who scope an emerging-technology project work alongside the engineers who build and run conventional systems for our clients. That keeps every recommendation grounded in what your environment can actually support.
Getting started
Most engagements begin with a conversation with your technical and business leads about one specific question. Are we exposed to the quantum threat to encryption? Could quantum methods help with this scheduling problem? Should these partners share a ledger? From that conversation we agree a short assessment with a fixed scope and a written outcome. If the assessment points to a pilot, we scope the pilot separately, so you never commit to more than the next step.
In depth
Readiness reviews and prototypes on simulators
Find exposed encryption and move to the new standards
Scheduling and allocation problems, tested fairly
Molecular simulation, research data and scheduling
Shared ledgers for records several parties must trust
Questions
For most production workloads, not yet. Today's machines are small and error-prone, and for nearly every business problem a well-tuned classical method still wins. What is ready is the preparation: learning which of your problems might benefit, building prototypes on simulators, and, most urgently, moving your encryption to post-quantum algorithms.
Because data encrypted today can be recorded today and decrypted later, once a large enough quantum computer exists. Information that must stay confidential for years, such as health, financial or government records, is exposed to that risk now. Replacing cryptography across an organization also takes a long time, so starting early is the safer plan.
Not yet. These are newer practices for us, so instead of results we will show you exactly how we would approach your question: the baseline, the test, and how we would judge the outcome.
No. A conventional database, solver or encryption upgrade is often the better answer, and we will say so. Because we build and run conventional systems too, we have no reason to push the newer option.
Related services
Support, security and monitoring from one MSP
Agents and models that do real work
Migrations and DBAs, without downtime
On-site IT support across New Jersey, New York City and Philadelphia. Remote services wherever you are. Areas we serve →
Tell us the problem. We will tell you plainly whether one of these technologies fits, and what a small first test would look like.
A few lines is enough. The engineers who do this work will reply within one business day.
Or email it.services@princetonits.com or call +1 (212) 507-9350.